Skip to content

Forthcoming Opinion

July 6, 2012

On Monday, July 9, in addition to hearing oral argument, the Supreme Court of Georgia will also release opinions in two cases, one of which is within the scope of our coverage. A brief summary is below and we will update on Monday morning with the opinion.

S12Q0625 Couch v. Red Roof Inns, Inc., et al.

This case began after Mr. Couch was robbed at gunpoint by a group of assailants while staying at a Red Roof Inn in Atlanta. He sued Red Roof Inns, alleging negligence and claiming the hotel had actual and constructive knowledge of the criminal activity on the premises. Red Roof Inns removed the case to federal court in the Northern District of Georgia and the case proceeded through discovery.

Both Couch and Red Roof Inns consented to the federal court certifying the following questions to the Georgia Supreme Court:

  1. In a premises liability case in which the jury determines a defendant property owner negligently failed to prevent a foreseeable criminal attack, is the jury allowed to consider the “fault” of the criminal assailant and apportion its award of damages among the property owner and the criminal assailant, pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 51-12-33?
  2. In a premises liability case in which the jury determines a defendant property owner negligently failed to prevent a foreseeable criminal attack, would jury instructions or a special verdict form requiring the jury to apportion its award of damages among the property owner and the criminal assailant, pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 51-12-33, result in a violation of the plaintiff’s constitutional rights to a jury trial, due process or equal protection?
The Court heard oral argument on these issues on March 6, 2012.
Advertisements

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: